Perspectiva științificã și cea a utilitãții în Assessment Center

Studiu de caz

Authors

  • Andrei Ion Universitatea din București

Keywords:

assessment center, scientific vs. utility perspective

Abstract

The present paper aims at analysing the current Assessment Center (AC) practices in Romania by
examining both the scientific and the utility perspectives neccesary for any personnel assessment
endeavour. Starting from a case study, the key features of an AC will be analyzed, as well as the
methodological flaws of the AC project presented. AC is a complex personnel assessment method,
which should be founded on thorrow knowledge of personnel assessment principles and practices. This
paper will outline the major risks and limitations of an AC which is not designed on a solid scientific
foundation and which does not take into account the major utility criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brannick, M. R., & Levine, E. L. (2002). Job Analysis.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hoevemayer, V., A. (2006). High Impact Interview
Questions. New York, NY: Amacom.
Pesci, J. (2006). Obituary – Douglas Bray. The Industrial
Organizational Psychologist, 44, 1, 173-175.
Spector, P., E. (2008). Industrial and Organizational
Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Thornton III, G. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment
Centers in Human Resource Management. NJ: New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

Downloads

Published

2020-01-24

How to Cite

Ion, A. (2020). Perspectiva științificã și cea a utilitãții în Assessment Center: Studiu de caz. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 9(2), 111–119. Retrieved from https://www.hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/379

Issue

Section

Human resources management in practice