Comparing the Cultures of Romania and The Netherlands: When East Meets West
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v8i2.416Keywords:
national culture, organisational cultureAbstract
Romania, a former communist country and a recent member to the European Union, and The
Netherlands, one of the oldest EU members with a long history of democracy, were compared on
national and organizational culture variables. A total of 1,182 Dutch and Romanian participants
completed questionnaires that measured (a) Hofstede’s four national culture dimensions of
power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism, and masculinity, (b) what they perceived
currently in their jobs (actual practices) and what they wished for in an ideal job (values) on five
dimensions of organizational culture: autonomy, interdepartmental coordination, external
orientation, human resource orientation, and improvement orientation, and (c) practices and
values for transformational leadership. The results showed that the Netherlands scored higher on
individualism, and lower on power distance and masculinity, than did Romania. The Dutch
perceived higher levels of how autonomy, interdepartmental coordination, human resource
orientation, and improvement orientation is actually practiced in organizations, and lower
practices levels for external orientation and transformational leadership than did the Romanian
sample. With respect to values, the Dutch scored higher on autonomy and lower on
interdepartmental coordination, external orientation, human resource orientation, improvement
orientation, and transformational leadership than did the Romanians. The finding that Romanians
are lower on most practices and higher on most values suggests that Romanians desire change
and that East and West European countries within the EU will grow closer to one another other
over time.
Downloads
References
transformational paradigm transcend
organizational and national boundaries?
American Psychologist, 52, 130–139.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1989). Manual for the
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo
Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Berry, J. W. (1980). Social and cultural change. In
H. C. Triandis & R. W. Brislin (Eds.),
Handbook of cross cultural psychology.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Delanty, D. (2003). The making of a post-western
Europe: A civilisational analysis. Thesis
Eleven, 7, 8–25.
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilisation?
Foreign Affairs, 7(3), 22-49.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences:
International differences in work-related
values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1994). Values Survey Module 1994
manual. Maastricht, Netherlands: University
of Limburg.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and
organizations: Software of the mind (Revised
and expanded 2nd edition). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders,
G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures:
A qualitative study across twenty cases.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-
316.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman,
P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture,
leadership and organizations: The GLOBE
study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and
postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and
political change in 43 societies. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2003). Modernization,
cultural change, and the persistence
traditional values. In: R. A. Dahl, I. Shapiro &
J. A. Cheibub (Eds.), The Democracy
Sourcebook (pp. 169-178). Cambridge: Mit
Press.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (1999) Romania: from procedural
democracy to European integration. In: M.
Kaldor & I. Vejvoda (Eds.), Democratization
in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 135-149).
London: Pinter.
Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2001). Do organizations
reflect national cultures? A 10-nation study.
International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 25, 89-107.
Oyserman, D. (2006). High power, low power, and
equality: Culture beyond individualism and
collectivism. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 16, 352-356.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M.
(2002). Rethinking Individualism and
Collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-
72.
Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. M., & Subirats, M.
(2002). Climate strength: a new direction for
climate research. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87, 220-229.
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values
and some implications for work. Applied
Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23–
47.
Schwartz , S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism:
Critique and proposed refinements. Journal
of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and
organizational analysis. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 28, 339–358.
Smith, K. E. (2004). The making of EU foreign
policy: The case of Eastern Europe.
Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, P. B., & Peterson, M. F. (1988). Leadership,
organization and culture: An event
management model. London: Sage.
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K. (2001).
An international study of the psychometric
properties of the Hofstede Values Survey
Module 1994: A comparison of individual and
country/province level results. Applied
Psychology: An International Review, 50,
269-281.
Spendzharova, A. (2003). Bringing Europe back in?
The impact of EU conditionality on Bulgarian
and Romanian politics. Southeast European
Studii şi Cercetări
41
Politics, 4(2), 141–156.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and
collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Van den Berg, P. T., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2004).
Defining, measuring and comparing
organisational cultures. Applied Psychology:
An International Review, 52, 571-582.
Van den Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997).
Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wilderom, C. P. M., & Van den Berg, P. T. (2010,
August). Socialized charismatic leadership
and organization culture as predictors of firm
performance. Paper presented at the
Academy of Management Conference,
Montreal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).


