Inventarul Psihologic California – CPI 260-Ro

Authors

  • Horia Dumitru Pitariu Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca
  • Dragoș Iliescu D&D Research, Bucureşti

Keywords:

personality assessment, CPI, CPI-260-Ro, CPI validation

Abstract

CPI-260-Ro is the Romanian version of CPI-260, a personality inventory derived from CPI. After translating and validating the inventory for the Romanian cultural context, its psychometrical properties have been evaluated on a sample of 2546 subjects. Its normative data, reliability and validity justify the use of this inventory on Romanian ground. The US-similar factorial structure leads to the use of a combined system of application, which leaves aside gender differences. A software that adjusts and makes a primary interpretation of data makes CPI-260-Ro reachable for a wide range of users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brief technical report on the CPI-260 Instrument (2002). Research Department CPP, Inc.

Coldea, D. (2004). Selecţia cadrelor militare care acţionează în condiţii de risc ridicat. Teză de doctorat.

Curşeu, P.L., Boroş, S. (2004). Femeia manager – între reprezentare şi realitate socială, Editura ASCR, Cluj Napoca

Day, D. V. & Bedeian, A. G. (1991a). Predicting job performance across organizations: The interaction of work orientation and psychological climate. Journal of Management, 17, 589-600.

Gheorghe, M. (2003). Inventarul de valori IVL-91, în Revista de Psihologie organizaţională, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, vol. III, nr 1-2, pag 71-82.

Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Counsulting Psychologists Press.

Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Counsulting Psychologists Press

Gough, H. G. & Bradley, P. (1996). California Psychological Inventory manual(3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Counsulting Psychologists Press.

Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement and prediction for personnel decisions, Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum.

Guion, R. M. & Gottier, R.F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection, Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.

Minulescu, M. (1996). Chestionarele de personalitate în evaluarea psihologică. Editura Garell Publishing House, Bucureşti.

Minulescu, M. (2004). Psihodiagnoză modernă. Chestionarele de personalitate. Editura Fundaţiei România de mâine.

Pitariu, H. D. & Hehn, H. (1980). Investigarea personalităţii cu ajutorul inventarului

psihologic California – C. P. I. Revista de Psihologie, 26, 461-473.

Pitariu, H. D. & Albu, M. (1993). Inventarul psihologic California: Prezentare de rezultate experimentale [The California Psychological Inventory: An overview and experimental results]. Revista de Psihologie, 39, 249-263.

Pitariu, H. D., Pitariu, H. A. & Ali Al Mutairi, M. (1998, August). Psychological assesment of managers in Romania: Validation of a test battery. Paper prezented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

Seisdedos, N.C., Pitariu, H.D. (1994). A cross-national comparison of personality measures (CPI). Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology.

Van den Berg, P.T., Pitariu, H.D. (2003). The Big Five and Well-being Outcomes During the Revolution in Romania, în Cogniţie Creier, Comportament, Nr .4, vol. 7, decembrie, pag 219-234.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-19

How to Cite

Pitariu, H. D., & Iliescu, D. (2019). Inventarul Psihologic California – CPI 260-Ro. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 2(1), 40–49. Retrieved from https://www.hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/57

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>